For All Have Sinned

There is a predominant teaching within Christianity that says we are all born into sin and our flesh is innately sinful. The crux of that teaching is based on texts found in Paul’s letter to the Romans.

bible-romans323The Romans Road

Many years ago, I was taught a “Plan for Salvation” called, The Romans Road. It was an evangelism tool to spread “the gospel message”: a series of various verses primarily from the book of Romans, strung together to formulate a “plan of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ”.

The underlying premise of this is that “we are all sinners by nature and choice”, “for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23), and “there is none righteous, no not one” (Romans 3:10), “wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned” (Romans 5:12).

While I agree sin is a choice we make, does Genesis teach that we are all innately sinners?

Death is the Result of Sin, but Sin is a Choice We Make

Genesis establishes that the one man through whom sin entered the world was Adam, and the consequence of that sin was death. Adam and Eve were removed from their access to the Tree of Life, so death passed upon all men thereafter since all those who came after Adam were also denied access to that tree.

But does that mean all of mankind are considered sinful by nature? No.

Read my study on the matter of “Original Sin” from Genesis 2-4, along with a breakdown of the passages in Romans claiming “for all have sinned” to see what I think Paul was referring to in saying such.

The bottom line of my study is that the Bible demonstrates humans have the capacity to not sin, and that it is not a part of our DNA structure to sin. Rather, the propensity for mankind to choose to sin is clearly prevalent, not just within the uncircumcised population (aka “the world”) but also within the circumcised nation.

Check out my study here: For All Have Sinned

Posted in Garden of Eden, Walking in the Ways of the Creator | 2 Comments

Is the Son of Man the Son of a Man?

father-and-son2In the New Testament, the reference “son of man” is attributed to Jesus over 75 times, but what does that mean?

The Greek word translated as “man” in that phrase is “anthropos” which means “a human being”, so this seems to mean “son of a human being”.

In the Old Testament Ezekiel is often referred to as “son of man”, and the Hebrew word for “man” in that phrase is “adam”, which means “man, mankind”, but is also the name of the first man made from the dust of the earth.

So, another way of phrasing this would be “son of adam”, or “son of mankind”.

As far as I am aware the Virgin Birth Doctrine does not argue against the human nature of Jesus. What it argues against is who his human father is.

Who is the Father of the Son of Man, Jesus?

The claim is that Joseph is not the physical father of Jesus, but rather it is supposed that he is the legal or adopted father of Jesus. This is despite the fact that he is never referred to as such in the New Testament.

But if that were the case, then who is Jesus’ physical father? He obviously came to be in the flesh, born of a woman, so who is his father?

Many, if not most, Virgin Birth advocates would claim Jesus has no physical father, but rather God miraculously prepared a body of flesh for Jesus, as he did with Adam, and placed that body in Mary’s womb to be born of her.

However, I see several flaws with this notion, the first being Jesus/Yeshua is called the son of man, why would he be called that if he really wasn’t the son of a man?  Continue reading

Posted in 6-Man and Woman, Jesus / Yeshua, Virgin Birth Doctrine | Leave a comment

Why Send Mary Away?

Why did Joseph think to send Mary away while she was with child?

pregnantNow the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily. But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost. (Matthew 1:18-20 KJV)

Sadly, this passage is so pre-loaded with the Virgin Birth Doctrine it is difficult to see anything other than what we’ve been taught.

The mainstream thought goes something like this:

Mary was espoused to Joseph, but before they came together (either in matrimony or in marital relations), she was found with child of the Holy Ghost (meaning: God made her to be pregnant without Joseph’s seed).

Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example (because she was pregnant out of wedlock with a child that did not come from Joseph), and (not wanting her to be accused of adultery) he was minded to put her away (meaning: divorce her) privily.

But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife (meaning: go ahead and marry her): for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost (meaning: it’s okay Joseph, the child she’s carrying is the Holy Spirit’s doing, and you’ve been tasked with providing for and protecting a child that’s not your own).

But that involves really outlandish assumptions given the fact that nowhere does it actually say that Joseph wasn’t the father.

On the contrary, it makes it very clear that:

  • Jesus/Yeshua is the son of David by way of Joseph (Matthew 1:16, Luke 3:23),
  • Joseph is of the house of David (Matthew 1:20, Luke 1:27, 2:4), and
  • Those who knew Jesus even remark, “Isn’t this the son of Joseph?” (Luke 4:22, John 1:45; 6:42).

The biggest known variable concerning the anticipated Messiah was that he be of the physical seed of David. And it has always been the case that sons are reckoned by their father in the Old Testament.

But all of this is overlooked in order to maintain this fabricated story.

Instead, it is rationalized that:

  • God formed a second Adam using David’s seed and placed him in Mary’s womb to be born, or
  • God formed a second Adam and placed him in Mary’s womb to be born and Mary must be of the house of David, therefore Jesus is reckoned to be the son of David through her, and
  • Joseph adopted Jesus as his son.

However, there’s nothing in the Bible to corroborate these rationalizations. They are just accepted as true.  Continue reading

Posted in Jesus / Yeshua, Virgin Birth Doctrine | 4 Comments

Session 1: In the Beginning – Introduction (DVBD)

dismantling-the-virgin-birth-doctrineGenesis 1 Establishes a Natural Order

Generally speaking, all life is made to reproduce after like kind.

Given that the Virgin Birth Doctrine deviates from this Natural Order established by the Creator in the beginning, the burden of proof should fall on the proponents of that doctrine to defend their case, not on those who adhere to the Creator’s way.

But because this doctrine is so pervasive in our modern western culture, the notion of the Messiah being born by natural means is widely considered to be the deviant position.

As a result, those who challenge the Virgin Birth doctrine often find themselves in the weaker position of having to speak from a limited pool of Biblical text, because the case for a Virgin Birth can only be made in a few verses, namely within the first chapters of Matthew and Luke.

But the fact of the matter is that the Bible at large not only speaks to the Natural Order, and strongly against the usurping of it, but it also speaks of many promises made by the Creator toward mankind by way of various covenants, all reinforcing the Natural Order.

Multiple witnesses testify of these things, and an ample supply of evidence to support this order and the carrying out of these covenants on the part of the Creator are often overlooked in the Virgin Birth debate.

Consequently, a great divide is formed between the Old and New Testaments, and many are either rejecting Jesus as the Messiah or embracing a false image of him.

So, I have chosen to act as the Prosecutor in the case for the Natural Order and the expectation concerning the Messiah, utilizing the entire Biblical text to challenge this doctrine and ultimately dismantle it.

My hope in presenting this case…

To equip the average person with the Biblical evidence to not only address the Virgin Birth talking points, but also to demonstrate beyond a shadow of doubt that the Bible not only overwhelmingly upholds the Natural Order, but requires the anticipated Messiah to be born of natural human descentContinue reading

Posted in 3-Grass, Seed-Yielding Herbs, Fruit Trees, 3-Land and Seas, 5-Sea Creatures and Winged Birds, 6-Living Creatures on Land, 6-Man and Woman, Creation, Jesus / Yeshua, Virgin Birth Doctrine | Leave a comment

Dismantling the Virgin Birth Doctrine: An Introduction

dismantling-the-virgin-birth-doctrine

I was raised to believe…

Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, and Joseph was not his biological father.

The idea was that while Mary, a virgin, was espoused to Joseph, she was visited by the Holy Spirit and miraculously became pregnant with Jesus without Joseph’s involvement. And when Jesus was born, Joseph became his adoptive parent.

As a result of this miraculous event, the thought continued, God was able to appear to mankind clothed in humanity.

This paved the way for another fundamental tenet of my Christian faith: the notion that Jesus was God.

I couldn’t really explain it rationally, but I had believed that Jesus was fully God and fully man, a hybrid God-man, if you will…simply because that is what I was taught.

But then…

When I began to realize, several years ago now, that not everything I understood concerning God and all that the Bible said was accurate, I decided to challenge the fundamental assertions of my faith by studying the Bible more intentlyContinue reading

Posted in 6-Man and Woman, Jesus / Yeshua, Virgin Birth Doctrine | 6 Comments

Genesis 1: Evening and Morning (Video)

In my Follow-Up Series to the video presentation on When a Day Begins and Ends, I address the most common objections to the notion that the Bible only speaks of the Day as being “the light”, separate from the Night.

The single most common objection I encounter is found in Genesis 1, particularly the statement:

And the evening and the morning were the first day. (Genesis 1:5b KJV)

Many believe this defines a different kind of Day, one that includes the Night.

Here’s my answer to that:

If you’ve never done the exercise of looking at all the uses of “ereb” (H6153) and “boqer” (H1242) in the Old Testament to see how thy are used elsewhere, I encourage you to do so.

While at times these words may be translated in English as “night”, “darkness” or “day”, and “light”, when you understand the nuances of what these words mean, that of “growing darkness” and “darkness seeking light”, I think you’ll get a better idea of what the verses that use these words are saying.

Let me know what you discover.

 

Posted in 1-Day and Night, Precept Upon Precept, What About? verses | Leave a comment

Correction: And God Divided Between the Light…

And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. (Gen 1:4 KJV)

The Brenton translation of the Greek Septuagint says:

And God saw the light that it was good, and God divided between the light and the darkness. (Gen 1:4 Brenton)

It was recently pointed out to me that the Hebrew word “beyn” (H996) translated above in the KJV as “from” appears twice in Genesis 1:4: once before the light, and the other before the darkness.

And upon further inspection in the Greek Septuagint, I see the phrase “ana mesos”, translated as “between” also appears twice in this verse.

A more proper translation of this then would be:

…And God divided between the light and between the darkness.

Given this, I don’t know how accurate my previous statement is, that this means God made a distinction between the light and the darkness.

Perhaps this verse is telling us He made distinctions between each: a distinction between the light, and a distinction between the darkness.

I still believe light is not darkness and darkness is not light, that they are two different things. Clearly God called them two different things in verse 5: “day” and “night”. But this verse may be meaning something more than what I first thought based on the English translation.

Hmm, very interesting.

Posted in 1-Day and Night, Precept Upon Precept | 1 Comment

When a Day Begins and Ends (Video)

Our modern culture teaches a day is a 24-hour period of time that begins at midnight. Jewish tradition teaches a day is a 24-hour period of time that begins at sunset. But what does the Bible say?

Watch this presentation covering the Biblical definition of the day, how long it lasts, when it begins and why it matters.

Posted in 1-Day and Night, 4-Sun Moon & Stars, Day of Atonement - Yom Kippur, Feast of Unleavened Bread, Passover - Pesach, Precept Upon Precept, Sabbath Day - Shabbath | Leave a comment

Made in His Image and Likeness

Genesis 5:3 establishes the notion that within humanity, a son bears a likeness to his father.

And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: (Gen 5:3 KJV)

We all understand this with physical features, where a son may physically look like his father bearing the same skin tone, hair and eye color, build and facial features.

Are you reflecting the likeness of the one in whose image you were made?

But because he was taught by his father, he also may carry similar traits found in his:

  • temperament
  • work ethic
  • love/compassion towards others
  • integrity/moral character

And similar interests like:

  • a love of the outdoors
  • being an avid reader
  • sharing a preference for types of foods, books, friends and even women
  • being a fan of sports and even of a particular sports’ teams

And engage in similar occupations:

  • doing a common trade or working in the same industry
  • carrying forward a generational business
  • following in the same footsteps regarding military service or being men of the cloth

When a child mirrors his father in all of these ways, we often say of him: He is his father’s son.

We’d even go as far as saying: He is his father.

Why?

Because he is a cookie-cutter image of the one who fathered him.

Does that mean he is truly his father?

Of course not. It’s clear they are two separate beings: one begotten of the other, but they carry the same spirit (attributes, habits, tastes, interests, skills, etc) in them. The son truly bears the likeness of his father.

That’s how I think it is with men being called sons of God, and particularly Yeshua being called the Son of God.   Continue reading

Posted in 6-Man and Woman, Jesus / Yeshua, Walking in the Ways of the Creator, YHVH Elohim/God | Leave a comment

Paul Saw the Light and Heard the Voice of Jesus

whitelightAccording to the book of Acts, Saul, before he came to be known as Paul, had an illuminating experience on the road to Damascus. He describes it like this:

“and it came to pass, in my going on and coming nigh to Damascus, about noon, suddenly out of the heaven there shone a great light round about me, I fell also to the ground, and I heard a voice saying to me, Saul, Saul, why me dost thou persecute?

`And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? and he said unto me, I am Jesus the Nazarene whom thou dost persecute– and they who are with me the light did see, and became afraid, and the voice they heard not of him who is speaking to me– and I said, What shall I do, Lord? and the Lord said unto me, Having risen, go on to Damascus, and there it shall be told thee concerning all things that have been appointed for thee to do.” (Act 22:6-10 YLT)

While he saw a great light round about him, the voice Paul heard was identified as being that of Jesus the Nazarene, not of God. (According to previous testimony in Acts, Jesus is resurrected from the dead at this point in time, situated at the right hand of God.)

Paul became temporarily physically blinded from that encounter and sometime thereafter Ananias explained what happened to him…

“`And when I did not see from the glory of that light, being led by the hand by those who are with me, I came to Damascus, and a certain one, Ananias, a pious man according to the law, being testified to by all the Jews dwelling there , having come unto me and stood by me, said to me, Saul, brother, look up; and I the same hour did look up to him; and he said, The God of our fathers did choose thee beforehand to know His will, and to see the Righteous One, and to hear a voice out of his mouth, because thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard; and now, why tarriest thou? having risen, baptize thyself, and wash away thy sins, calling upon the name of the Lord.” (Act 22:11-16 YLT)

Ananias explained that Saul was chosen by God:

  • to know the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’s will
  • to see the Righteous One, and to hear a voice out of his mouth

It is my understanding  the Righteous One is the one situated at the right hand of God.  Continue reading

Posted in Jesus / Yeshua, Paul, YHVH Elohim/God | Leave a comment